Income inequality has been a concern for economists and policymakers for many years. The long-run increase in income inequality not only raises social and political concerns but also economic ones. It tends to drag down GDP growth due to the rising distance of the lower 40% from the rest of society. The relationship between aggregate output and income distribution is an important topic in macroeconomics. This essay will examine the impact of income inequality on long-run economic growth, drawing on economic theory and empirical analysis.
Theoretical Framework
In a seminal contribution, Galor and Zeira (1993) proposed a model with credit market imperfections and indivisibilities in investment to show that inequality affects GDP per capita in both the short and long runs. Galor and Zeira’s model predicts that the effect of rising inequality on GDP per capita is negative in relatively developed countries but positive in underdeveloped countries. This is because credit market imperfections prevent low-income households from investing in human capital, which reduces their productivity and income. This effect is more pronounced in developed countries, where human capital is crucial for growth.
For example, in layman’s terms, consider two countries: one rich and one poor. In rich countries, where human capital is more important for growth, credit market imperfections prevent low-income households from investing in education and training. This reduces their productivity and income, which drags down GDP per capita growth. In contrast, in a poor country where physical capital is more important for growth, credit market imperfections may have less of an impact on GDP per capita growth.
Empirical Analysis
Empirical analysis shows that for the average country in the sample during 1970-2010, increases in income inequality reduce GDP per capita. Specifically, a one percentage point increase in the Gini coefficient reduces GDP per capita by around 1.1% over five years; the long-run (cumulative) effect is larger and amounts to about -4.5%. This finding implies that, on average, increases in the level of income inequality lead to lower transitional GDP per capita growth.
For example, consider a country with a Gini coefficient of 40 (a moderate level of income inequality). If the Gini coefficient increases by one percentage point to 41 (indicating an increase in income inequality), this reduces GDP per capita by around 1.1% over five years.
Channels through which Inequality Affects Growth
Inequality can hurt economic growth through several channels. Firstly, high levels of inequality can reduce social mobility and create an unequal distribution of opportunities. This can lead to a less efficient allocation of resources and lower levels of human capital accumulation. For example, if students from low-income households have less access to high-quality education than students from high-income households, this can reduce their future productivity and income.
Secondly, high levels of inequality can lead to political instability and social unrest, reducing investment and economic growth. High levels of income disparity, for instance, may cause widespread discontent with the political system or social instability (such as riots or protests), which may lower investor confidence and hinder investment.
Thirdly, high levels of inequality can reduce aggregate demand by reducing the purchasing power of lower-income households. If high-income inequality can diminish aggregate demand and hinder economic growth if lower-income households have less disposable income to spend on goods and services than higher-income households.
Policy Implications
Policymakers have several tools at their disposal to address income inequality. Progressive taxation, where higher-income households pay a larger share of their income in taxes than lower-income households, can help reduce after-tax income inequality. Social transfers, such as unemployment benefits and food assistance programs, can also help reduce income inequality by supporting lower-income households.
For example, if a nation has a well-designed system of social transfers that supports lower-income households (by offering benefits for unemployment or food assistance), this might aid in reducing income disparity.
In addition to these direct measures, policymakers can address income inequality through broader economic policies to promote inclusive growth. For example, investments in education and training can help improve access to high-quality jobs for lower-income households. Policies encouraging entrepreneurship and small business development can also help create new economic opportunities for lower-income households.
コメント